← Library
Madras High CourtA/687/2026allowed

M/S. Gympac Fitness Systems Pvt. Ltd v. Axis Bank Limited

2026-02-25Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 687 of 2026 IN CS NO. 4 OF 2024 M/s. Gympac Fitness Systems Pvt. Ltd Represented by its Director, Mr.Manmohan Gupta, Old No.7-A, New No.15, Giri Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

Applicant(s) Vs Axis Bank Limited New No.3, Old No.2, Club House Road, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

Respondent(s) For Applicant(s):

M/S.Chandini Pradeep Kumar Rahul M Shankhar For Respondent:

Mr.V.V.Sivakumar

ORDER

This application has been filed by the applicant to permit the applicant to file additional documents.

2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit and filed the suit for the relief of declaration and mandatory injunction. At the time of filing of the suit, the petition mentioned documents are not available with them. Therefore, in order to prove the case of the plaintiff, those document is essential to prove the case. Therefore, filed this application.

3. The other side strongly objected on the ground that the said document is no way related to the present case.

4. Considering the nature of application and this application is filed to receive the documents. As far as the admissibility, relevancy and proof, it cannot be tested through this application. This application is filed only to grant leave for production of documents belatedly. Therefore, this petition is allowed and the documents can be received subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility. The respondent is at liberty to raise any objections at the time of marking the documents in all aspects. 25.02.2026 (2/3) mtl

P. DHANABAL , J.

mtl A No. 687 of 2026 in CS No.4 of 2024 25.02.2026