← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3042/2011dismissed for default

S.Johnson v. Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd

2019-06-26Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP(NPD).Nos.3042 to 3044 of 2011 and MP.Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2011 CRP.No.3042 of 2011 S.Johnson ... Petitioner vs.

1.Jayapriya Chits Funds P. Ltd., Neyveli - 2, Cuddalore District.

2.A.Vijaya 3.L.John Mary 4.G.Jacob 5.M.Ramachandran 6.A.J.Martin Felix Celvia ... Respondents CRP.No.3043 of 2011 S.Johnson ... Petitioner vs.

1.Jayapriya Chits Funds P. Ltd., Rep. by its Foreman, Neyveli - 2, Cuddalore District.

2.B.Sagayaraj 3.J.Ambikapathy 4.S.Chandrasekaran 5.S.Varatharajan 6.A.J.Martin Felix Celvia ...Respondents CRP.No.3044 of 2011 A.S.Dhanapal Raj ... Petitioner vs.

1.Jayapriya Chits Funds P. Ltd., Neyveli - 2, Cuddalore District.

2.B.Sagayaraj 3.S.Chandrasekaran 4.G.Jacob 5.M.A.Swamikannu 6.S.Johnson 7.A.J.Martin Felix Celvia ...Respondents Prayer in CRP.No.

: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order dated 10.03.2011 in EP.No.57 of 2010 in AR.No.993 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli.

Prayer in CRP.No.

: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order dated 16.06.2011 in EP.No.59 of 2010 in AR.No.996 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli. Prayer in CRP.No.

: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order dated 10.06.2011 in EP.No.132 of 2010 in AR.No.733 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli. For Petitioners : No appearance (in all CRPs) For Respondents : Mr.P.Jagadeeswaran for R2 (in all CRPs.) No appearance (for all other respondents) C O M M O N O R D E R When these Civil Revision Petitions came up for hearing on 25.06.2019, there was no representation for the revision petitioners and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 26.06.2019. Even today, i.e., 26.06.2019 there is no representation for the revision petitioners. The learned counsel for the second respondent is present.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi

2. In view of the same, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.

26.06.2019 mbi Index : Yes/No To The Subordinate Court, Neyveli.

CRP(NPD).Nos.3042 to 3044 of 2011 and MP.Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2011