Kalpana v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3942 of 2022 1 KALPANA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 DEVADHARSHINI Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB, TIRUPPUR CITY.
(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S. J.FRANKLIN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned Counsel for the petitioner is present. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petition enquiry in Current Paper No.COP/DGP/TPR-City/2021 is pending.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the respondent police is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Further, this Court directs the respondent police not to harass the petitioner till then.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
-sd/- 18/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/S. J.FRANKLIN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.2765 CRL OP.3942/2022 Date :18/02/2022 CSK 23/02/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/