Madras High CourtWP/9647/2014dismissed as infructuous

K.Ulaganathan, v. The Commissioner Of

2017-10-10Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10-10-2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.9647 of 2014 K.Ulaganathan ..

Petitioner -vsThe Commissioner of Agriculture, Office of the Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to issue appointment order as Assistant Agriculture Officer pursuant to the marks that the petitioner has scored in the Interview conducted on 24.1.2009 for the recruitment of Assistant Agriculture Officer based on the representation dated 9.4.2013 made by the petitioner.

For Petitioner - Mr.R.Sendhilkumar For Respondent - Mrs.K.Bhuvaneshwari, Government Advocate.

ORDER

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Svn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner of Agriculture, Office of the Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

+ 1 cc to M/s.K.Thilageswaran, Advocate,SR.73088 + 1 cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.73363 W.P.No.9647 of 2014 NR 08/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/