V.Kanniammal v. Swaminathan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.A.No.1324 of 1999 V.Kanniammal ...Appellant Vs.

1.Saminathan 2.Vasanthi 3.R.N.Duraisamy 4.S.R.N.Kaliappa Mudaliar 5.R.N.Mariappan 6.R.N.Ramaswamy

...Respondents

(R3, Exparte in the lower Court and hence no batta need to be paid) Prayer: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree of the learned Second Additional District Judge, Erode in A.S.No.22/95 dated 1801.1999 preferred against the judgment and decree of the learned Second Additional District Munsif, Erode in O.S.No.297/88 dated 13.12.1994.

For Appellant : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Gunaseelan for R1 & R2 R3- Exparte Batta due reg. R4,R6

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that he has not received any instructions from the appellant and without any instructions he is not in a position to conduct the case before this Court. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the above, this court has no other option, except to dismiss this second appeal as no instructions. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS II ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar kas To.

1.The II Addl. District Judge Erode 2.The II Addl. District Munsif Erode S.A.No.1324 of 1999 ss(co) nr 26/02/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/