S.Rangaswamy, v. The District Supply Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.01.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM S.Rangaswamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Supply Officer, Erode.

2. The Inspector of Food Cell, Civil Supply, CID, Erode.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the proceedings of the 1st respondent made in Na.Ka.No.6185/2005/K2 dated 28.01.2005 and quash the same and a consequential mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from invoking the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Kerosene Control (Regulation of Trade) Order 1973 without finding pursuant to the FIR No.23 dated 24.01.2005.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Peter Francis For Respondents : Mr.G.Krishna Raja, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, made a submission that the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 24.01.2024 skr Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order To

1. The District Supply Officer, Erode.

2. The Inspector of Food Cell, Civil Supply, CID, Erode.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

skr 24.01.2024