Shanmugham Chettiar v. Govindammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.07.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA S.A.Nos.852 and 973 of 1999 S.A.No.852/99:

1.Shanmugham Chettiar 2.Sadanandam 3.Veerattalingam .. Appellants Vs 1.Govindammal 2.Seetharaman .. Respondents S.A.NO.973/99 Sri Selva Vinaykakar Temple represented by its Trustees 1.Shanmugham Chettiar 2.Sadanandam 3.Veerattalingam ...Appellants vs 1.Govindammal 2.Seetharaman .. Respondents Prayer in S.A.No.852 of 1999: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.07.1998 in A.S.No.145 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1996 made in O.S.No.109 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti. Prayer in S.A.No.973 of 1999: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.07.1998 in A.S.No.146 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1996 made in O.S.No.400 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti. For Appellants : Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Sathiyakumar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

COMMON JUDGMENT Today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants filed a memo along with the return cover stating that the letter sent to the first appellant has been returned as the first appellant died. 2.Recording the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, these second appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar cse To 1.The Sub Court, Panruti.

2.The District Munsif Court, Panruti.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.A.Nos.852 and 973 of 1999 gj(co) pmk.11.8.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/