Kaliyaperumal v. Senthilkumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Crl.O.P. No.752 of 2016

1. Kaliyaperumal

2. Padmanaban

3. Narmadha

...Petitioners

Vs.

Senthilkumar ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and quash the private complaint filed in C.C. No.144 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Panruti in so far as the petitioners/A1, A4 & A6.

For Petitioners : K. Gandhi Kumar For Respondent : No Appearance

O R D E R

This Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.42 of 2017 on the file of the respondent.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that since acquittal order passed by Judicial Magistrate, Panruti, in C.C.No.144 of 2015, there is nothing survive in the present petition for adjudication.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In view of the above, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed if any.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lbm To

1. The Judicial No.II Magistrate, Panruti,

2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panruti Crl.O.P. No.752 of 2016 SSI(CO) SB(05/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/