Arumugam v. State By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Criminal Appeal No.663 of 2015 Crl MP No.5597 of 2023
1. Arumugam
2. Sakthivelraja ..
Appellants /Accused 2 and 4 Vs.
State by The Inspector of Police, D-4 Otteri Police Station, Kancheepuram District ..
Respondents/Complainant Appeal filed under section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, to setaside the conviction of the appellants in C.C.No.43 of 2012 dated 12.09.2015 by the learned I Additional Special Judge for NDPS and EC Act cases, Chennai 600 104.
For Appellant :
M.S.Charles For Respondent :
Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate [Crl. Side] for R1
JUDGMENT
This Criminal appeal was filed against the judgement and order passed by the learned First Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases and Principal Special Judge, Chennai in C.C.No.43 of 2012, dated 12.09.2015 convicting and sentencing the appellants (A2 and A4) for an offence under Section 8(c) r/w Section 20(b) (ii) (c) of the NDPS Act and sentenced them to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each and in default to under go two months Rigorous imprisonment. 2.
The appellants were acquitted from the charge under Section 8 (c) r/w Section 29 of the NDPS Act. The Court below also directed the period already undergone by the appellants to be set off under Section 428 of Cr.PC. 3.
When the matter came up for hearing on 22.02.2023, this Court passed the following order :-
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 05.01.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. It is seen from records that the appellants were arrested and imprisoned from 04.05.2012 onwards. The Court below had convicted the appellants for offence under Section 8(c) r/w Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act and sentenced each of the appellant to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each and in default to undergo 2 months Rigorous Imprisonment. It is not known as to whether the appellants have already undergone the sentence. 2.The learned Government Advocate is directed to immediately take instructions from the Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Puzhal as to whether the appellants have already undergone the entire period of sentence.
3.Post these Criminal Appeals under the caption "for orders"on 01.03.2023.
4.
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate produced the written instructions received from the Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Puzhal. The details that are provided in the written instructions are
extracted hereunder :- Sl.No.
CT No.Name and Father's Name Police Station Cr. No.
Trial Court and Conviction details Sentence Date of Admis sion in prison Date of releas e on expiry of senten ce 1.
No.6030 Arumugam S/o.Murugesan U/s.8(c) r/w.20(b) (ii) (c) of NDPS Act - Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine Rs.1,00,000/- i/d Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 months and the period undergone by the prisoner in remand was ordered to be setoff [04.05.2012 to 11.09.2015] 12.09.
04.07.
2.
No.6032 Sakthivel Raja S/o.Murugesan D-4 Otteri Police Station Cr.No.287 of 12.09.
04.07.
I Additional Special Judge for EC and NDPS Act cases C.C.No.43/20 5.
It is clear from the above that the appellants have already undergone the entire sentence and they have been released after the expiry of the sentence.
6.
In the light of the above development, there is no need
for this Court to go into the merits of the case and the written instructions received from the concerned authority and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate is recorded and this Criminal Appeal stands closed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.03.2023 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes / No rka To
1. I Additional Special Judge for NDPS and EC Act cases, Chennai 600 104.
2. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Vellore.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J rka Crl.A.No.663 of 2015 01.03.2023