← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4371/2020disposed of

Vijay Shankar R.K v. The District Collector,

2021-09-14Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.09.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.NO.4371 OF 2020 Vijay Shankar R.K .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Corporation Rippon Building Chennai.

3. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajar Maaligai Egmore Chennai 8.

4. The Commissioner of Police Vepery Chennai.

5. The Director of Fire and Rescue Service Government of Tamil Nadu No.1, Greams Road Thousand Lights Chennai 6.

6. The Commissioner of Food Safety 5th Floor of DMS Office Building 359, Anna Salai DMS Campus Teynampet Chennai 600 006.

7. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board 76, Mount Salai Guindy Chennai 600 032.

8. Raja

9. Varalakshmi .. Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st to 7th respondents to consider the representation dated 15.09.2019 and take necessary action against the 8th and 9th respondents within time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For the Petitioner :

Mr.S.Saravanan Satheesh Kumar For the Respondents :

Mrs.R.Anitha Counsel for State for respondents 1, 4 to 6 Ms.P.Veena Suresh for respondent-3 Ms.Shanmugavalli Sekar for respondent-7

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner has many grievances against his neighbours and complains of the Corporation authorities not taking the petitioner's complaint seriously.

2. In view of the nature of order proposed to be made, no previous service is required on the private parties.

3. The petitioner has already made a representation to the Corporation. The petitioner's representation should be considered by the Revenue Officer of Valasaravakkam Zone and a speaking reply should be issued to the petitioner within eight weeks from date.

4. If the complaints made against the private respondents appear to be worthy, immediate appropriate action should be

taken upon previous notice to the relevant private parties.

5. It is made clear that the allegations levelled against the private parties have not been gone into by this Court and it will be open to the concerned official to deal with the representation in accordance with law.

6. W.P.No.4371 of 2020 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kpl To:

1. The District Collector Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai.

3. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajar Maaligai Egmore, Chennai 8.

4. The Commissioner of Police Vepery, Chennai.

5. The Director of Fire and Rescue Service Government of Tamil Nadu No.1, Greams Road Thousand Lights, Chennai 6.

6. The Commissioner of Food Safety 5th Floor of DMS Office Building 359, Anna Salai, DMS Campus Teynampet, Chennai 600 006.

7. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board 76, Mount Salai Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

+1cc to M/S.Kathikaa Ashok, 2nd Respondent Advocate,S.R.No.46419 +1cc to M/S.P.Veena Suresh,3rd Respondent Advocate, S.R.No.46591 +1cc to M/S.M.Sekar, 7th Respondent Advocate, S.R.No.46396 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.46844 W.P.No.4371 of 2020 NR(CO) PM/20/09/2021