← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/2881/2023granted

Sella Kumarasamy @ Kumarasamy v. Inspector Of Police

2023-02-09Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.36 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and the petitioner are relative. The petitioner is the brother-in-law to the defacto complainant. While so, on 15.01.2023 when the husband of the defacto complainant by name Aruchamy was grazing his cattle in the land of his father, the petitioner came and attacked the husband of the defacto complainant with a cricket bat, thereby, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 1/4

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner abused and assaulted the defacto complainant's husband with a cricket bat, thereby, he sustained injuries and now, the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a 2/4

copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Sunday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

09.02.2023 Internet : Yes/No gbi 3/4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

gbi 09.02.2023 4/4