Kalimuthu Thandapani v. The District Collector

W.M.P. No.3239 of 2022 in W.P. No.3080 of 2022 W.M.P. No.3239 of 2022 in W.P. No.3080 of 2022 M.SUNDAR, J.

and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity]. 2.

Captioned WMP has been filed with prayer to dispense with production of 'original impugned notice dated 04.02.2022 bearing reference Na.Ka.3507/2021/A3' [hereinafter 'impugned notice' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity]. 3.

Mr. S. Ramesh, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Thamarai Selvam, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before this Court.

4.

Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the original impugned notice was not readily available with writ petitioner at the time of filing of captioned writ petition and therefore, photocopy of the impugned notice was filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.

Page Nos.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P. No.3239 of 2022 in W.P. No.3080 of 2022 M. SUNDAR, J.

and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

cad 5.

Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned notice is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

6.

In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S., J.] [H.C., J.] 21.07.2025 cad W.M.P. No.3239 of 2022 in W.P. No.3080 of 2022 Page Nos.2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis