Geetha v. K.Arul

CMP No.3011 of 2025 in CMA SR No.15662 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with.

Though notice was served on the second respondent and his name appears in the cause list, there is no representation for the second respondent.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 955 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

The petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period.

Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission.

18.03.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis