Renugambal v. Pichandi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-08-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in S.A.No.51 of 2016 RENUGAMBAL Appellant(s) Vs

1. PICHANDI 2.P.Sakthivel 3.P.Lakshmi 4.NANDAGOPAL 5.Munusamy Naicker 6.RAMANI Respondent(s) For Petitioner:

No appearance For Respondent:

Mrs.G.Sumithra for RR1 to 4

ORDER

This application has been filed to condone the delay of 49 days in filing the petition to restore the Second Appeal which was dismissed on 15.11.2018 by this Court.

2. When the matter was taken up today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. In spite of the appeal having been dismissed for default, the appellant seems to be not interested in prosecuting the appeal and he has filed this petition only to keep the litigation pending.

4. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 22-08-2025 dsa

To 1.PICHANDI S/o Narayanasami Naicker, Kosalai Village, Adi Annamalai Post, Tiruvananmalai Tk And Dist.

2.P.Sakthivel S/o Pichandi, Respondents 2 To 4 Are Res At Kosalai Village, Adi Annamalai Post, Tiruvnnmalai Tk And Dist.

3.P.Lakshmi D/o Pichandi, Respondents 2 To 4 Are Res At Kosalai Village, Adi Annamalai Post, Tiruvnnmalai Tk And Dist.

4.NANDAGOPAL S/o Pichandi, Respondents 2 To 4 Are Res At Kosalai Village, Adi Annamalai Post, Tiruvnnmalai Tk And Dist.

5.Munusamy Naicker S/o Pichalkutty, Colourkettai Village, Adaiyur Mathura, Tiruvananmalai Tk And Dist.

6.RAMANI S/o Ramakrishnan, Kosalai Village, Adi Annamalai Post, Tiruvananmalai Tk And Dist.

K.KUMARESH BABU J.

dsa in S.A.No.51 of 2016 22-08-2025