Venugopal Gounder v. Indian Bank

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.36004 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.38825 of 2005 Venugopal Gounder ..Petitioner vs

1. Indian Bank, Rep.by its Authorised Officer, No.258, M.G.Road, Pondicherry.

2. Government of Pondicherry, Rep.by Director of Agriculture/ Director of Sugars, Pondicherry.

3. EID Party (I) Limited, Rep.by its Vice President, Dare House, No.234, NSC Bose Road, Chennai.

4. New Horizon Sugar Mills, Rep.by its Managing Director, Ariyur, Pondicherry.

.. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to revise the sale price of the sugar as well as the molasses on par with the market price and to realise the stock after weighing the same within the premises of the 4th respondent Mill in the presence of representatives of the Sugar Farmers. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajaya Kumar For Respondents : Ms.G.Djearany Government Advocate (Pondy) for R2 No appearance for R1, R3 and R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In the light of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To

1. The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, No.258, M.G.Road, Pondicherry.

2. The Director of Agriculture/ Director of Sugars Government of Pondicherry, Director of Sugars, Pondicherry.

W.P.No.36004 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.38825 of 2005 SV(CO) CS/28/08/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/