Madras High CourtWP/6449/2010dismissed as infructuous

Kamal Basha, v. The District Collector,

2019-09-04Honourable Mr Justice Subramonium Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD WP.No.6449 of 2010 Kamal Basha ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Assistant Director of Survey, Krishnagiri District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent relating to the order issued in Na.Ka.T5/1966/09 dated 09.09.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to post the petitioner to maintenance Section, Krishnagiri District.

For Petitioner : Ms.Selvi George For Respondents: Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has retired. Since the writ petitioner has challenged his transfer, the same had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement on the memorandum of grounds of Writ petition. Hence, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

klt To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Assistant Director of Survey, Krishnagiri District.

WP.No.6449 of 2010 RR(CO) CB(23/10/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/