Madras High CourtWP/6572/2010dismissed for nonprosecution

Dhanalakshmi, v. The Sub Registrar Joint-I,

2019-07-24Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 24.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.6572 of 2010 Dhanalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Sub Registrar Joint-I, Office of the Sub Registrar Joint-I, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore -1.

2.Sri Raghavammal Kattalai, Manjakuppam Cuddalore District, Rep. by its Hereditary Trustees

1) T.Ekambara Gurukkal

2) T.Muthukumarasamy Gurukkal

3) Sekar @ Gnanasekara Gurukkal ..Respondents [R2 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 02.11.2011 in M.P.No.1 of 2011] Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in letter No.Na.Ka.No.P2/APB/2010, dated 03.03.2010 and in letter No.Na.Ka.No.P2/APB/201, dated 08.03.2010, quash the same as illegal and invalid, and consequently direct the respondent to release the document of power of attorney registered on his file in Document No.P201000002 (Book 4) dated 04.02.2010 to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Purushothaman, G.A., for R1 Mr.K.Premkumar, for R2 - - - - https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

This petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the letters of the first respondent dated 03.03.2010 and dated 08.03.2010 and consequently direct the first respondent to release the document of power of attorney registered on his file in Document No.P201000002 (Book 4) dated 04.02.2010 to the petitioner.

2. When the matter came up for hearing on 05.08.2010 and 22.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the second respondent would submit that in view of the decree passed by the Civil Court in O.S.No.251 of 1995, dated 13.10.1995, the power of attorney document presented by the petitioner was refused to receive by the first respondent.

4. In the light of the above fact, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To 1.The Sub Registrar Joint-I, Office of the Sub Registrar Joint-I, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore -1.

+1cc to Mr.K.Premkumar , Advocate, S.R.No.63170 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.64221 NRJK(CO) CB(10/09/2019) W.P.No.6572 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/