G.Gunasekaran v. The Chairman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No. 4324 of 2020 G.Gunasekaran ..Petitioner Vs.
1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai.
2.Senior Accounts Officer (Pension) Chennai Port Trust, Chennai ..Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to calculate and pay the pensionary benefits to the petitioner taking into account of his entire service from 27.12.1982 to 30.04.2019 in the respondent Port Trust.
For Petitioner :
Mr. S.Gopinathan For Respondents :
Mr. Hajamohideen Gisthi
ORDER
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted before this Court that the prayer sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous, therefore nothing survives for adjudication.
Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
ak To 1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai.
2.The Senior Accounts Officer (Pension) Chennai Port Trust, Chennai +1cc to Mr.P.Ulaganathan, Advocate SR. No. 41438 W.P.No. 4324 of 2020 SRII (CO) PR (19/07/2022)