← Library
Madras High CourtWA/353/2011disposed of

S.Balasubramaniyan v. The Director Of Elementary

2017-06-14Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan,Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.A No.353 of 2011 M.P.No. 1 of 2015 S.Balasubramaniyan ...Appellant/Petitioner Vs

1. The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

2. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Salem District, Salem.

3. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Gangavalli Panchayat Union, Gangavalli-636 105, Salem.

4. D.Rajkumar

...Respondents/Respondents

Prayer:- Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letter Patent against the order in W.P.No.30044 of 2010 dated 24.01.2011. Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the orders of the 2nd respondent in Na. Ka. No. 8208/A2/2010 dt 23.12.2010 and quash the same. For Appellant : Mr. S.Kamadevan For Respondents: Mr.K.Dhananjayan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3

J U D G M E N T

K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.

The appellant filed a Writ Petition in W.P.No.30044 of 2010, challenging the order dated 23 December, 2010, in and by which, he was reverted to the post of Secondary Grade teacher by the District Elementary Educational Officer, Salem. While setting aside the order on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice, the learned Single Judge made certain observations on the merits of the matter. Feeling aggrieved on account of the observations with regard to the merits of the matter, the appellant has came up with this intra court appeal.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. We have also heard the learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

3. The order passed by the District Elementary Educational Officer, dated 23 December, 2010 was quashed by the learned Judge only on the ground of violation of principles of natural Justice. While directing the District Elementary Educational Officer, to consider the matter afresh, the learned Judge appears to have made certain observations on the merits of the matter.

4. We direct the District Elementary Educational Officer, Salem, to consider and dispose of the matter, uninfluenced by any of the observations made by the learned single Judge on the merits of the matter.

5. The Writ Appeal is disposed of with the above clarification. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

svki/msvm To

1. The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

2. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Salem District, Salem.

3. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Gangavalli Panchayat Union, Gangavalli-636 105, Salem.

+1cc to Mr.S.Kamadevan, Advocate Sr.41958 +1cc to Mr.V.Ravikumar, Advocate Sr.42184 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.42280 W.A No. 353 of 2011 kj[co] srg 30/06/2017