← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4598/2011dismissed as infructuous

Vengadachalam v. Ambujam Alias Manonmani

2019-07-16Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP NPD No.4598, 4599 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 + 1 of 2011 Vengadachalam ... Petitioner in both petitions Vs.

1. Ambujam alias Manonmani

2. Porkalai

3. Thilagavathi

4. Saravanan alias Lamber Saravanan

5. Vijaya

6. Ambiga

7. Poongodai

8. Eswari

9. Vembu ... Respondents in both petitions Prayer in CRP(NPD) No.4598 of 2011: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the orders dated 19.10.2011 in E.A.No.480 of 2011 in E.A.No.273 of 2011 in E.P.No.185 of 2000 by the II Additional District Munsif, Puducherry. Prayer in CRP(NPD) No.4599 of 2011: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the orders dated 19.10.2011 in E.A.No.481 of 2011 in E.A.No.273 of 2011 in E.P.No.185 of 2000 by the II Additional District Munsif, Puducherry. http://www.judis.nic.in

R.HEMALATHA, J., mst For Petitioner in : Mr.Senthilkumar both petitions for Mr.S.Sethuraman C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the civil revision petitioner contended that E.A.No.273 of 2011 in E.P.No.185 of 2000 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Puducherry was disposed of on merits and therefore, nothing survives in these civil revision petitions for further adjudication. He also made an endorsement to that effect. Hence, the Civil Revision Petitions in CRP 4598/2011 and CRP 4599 of 2011 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.07.2019 mst Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking/non speaking To The II Additional District Munsif, Puducherry. CRP NPD No.4598, 4599 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 + 1 of 2011 http://www.judis.nic.in