← Library
Madras High CourtWP/20189/2015dismissed as infructuous

Management Of Tamil Nadu v. The Presiding Officer

2024-02-06Honourable Dr Justice D.Nagarjun4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.02.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Region II) Ltd., Chennimalai Road, Erode -1.

... Petitioner -vs1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.

2.R.Narayanasamy ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Labour Court, Salem made in C.P. No. 198/2000 dated 20.09.2012 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr. M.Murali Vinoth For Respondents : Mr. S.R. Navin Prabhu for M/s.K.V. Shanmuganathan 1/4

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the award passed in C.P. No. 198/2000 dated 20.09.2012 by the 1st respondent/Labour Court, Salem. 2.When this matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel representing the respondents submitted that aggrieved by the order passed in I.D.No.88 of 1997 dated 22.01.1997, through which this C.P.No.198/2000 originates, the petitioner management has preferred Writ Petition in W.P. No.19999 of 1999, which came to be dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner corporation has also preferred W.A. No. 3635 of 2019 and same was also dismissed. Once the Writ Petition and Writ Appeal are dismissed, confirming the orders passed in I.D. No.88 of 1997, there is nothing left for the petitioner in challenging the C.P. orders.

It is also further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the orders in C.P. No.198/2000, the petitioner Corporation has deposited a sum of Rs.1,83,295/- before the 1st respondent/Labour Court. Once the petitioner has already complied with the direction of C.P. and deposited the money as directed in the C.P. order, this petition challenging the C.P. becomes infructuous.

does not survive any more for the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The respondents are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner before the trial. No costs.

06.02.2024 Index: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No gsa To The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.

3/4

DR. D.NAGARJUN.J, gsa 06.02.2024 4/4