Madras High CourtCRL RC/55/2014dismissed as infructuous

P.Veeraiyan v. The Revenue Divisional

2017-04-24Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.04.2017 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl. Revision Case No.55 of 2014 and Crl.M.P.Nos.1 of 2011 & 1 of 2014

1. P. Veeraiyan

2. P. Mani

3. Aburvam

4. K. Jeyathambal

5. P. Gowri

6. M. Viswanathan

7. M. Selvam

8. M. Chinnathambi

9. K. Natarajan

10. R. Karuthammal

11. M. Panneer

12. P. Selvaraj

13. K. Natarajan

14. C. Sivapakkiam

15. A. Durairaj

16. P. Kalian

17. M. Dhanushkodi

18. S. Mahalingam

19. Pattu

20. T. Saroja

21. V. Chinnapillai

22. P. Chinnapillai

23. P. Anjan

24. K. Mamangam

25. C. Annadurai

26. P. Ravi

27. M. Thayyan

28. K. Muthukannu

29. S. Ramu

30. M. Rajendran

31. S. Gandhi

32. V. Venugopal

33. V. Ramu

34. V.A. Kaliaperumal

35. S. Anandhan

36. N. Murugaiyan

37. S. Nagarajan

38. H. Gunasekaran

39. C. Panneerselvam

40. J. Govindaraj

41. J. Pakkirisamy

42. A. Kasinathan

43. A. Dakshinamurthy

44. T. Uthirapathi

45. A. Rethinam

46. A. Kaliaperumal

47. K. Dakshinamurthy

48. K. Shanmugam

49. K. Kathaiyan ... Petitioners //vs//

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Sub-Divisional Magistrate), Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur District.

2. The Joint Land Commissioner, (Under the Land Reforms Act), Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District 609 001.

3. K. Singaravelu Udaiyar

4. K. Kalyanasundara Udaiyar (since deceased) ... Respondents Prayer:

Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records from the first respondent relating to the order bearing Na.Ka. No.2799/2011/A2 (under 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) dated 05.08.2011 and set aside the same and award costs.

For Petitioners :

Mr.T.V.Padmanathan For Respondents :

Mr.R.Ravichandran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

for R1 and R2.

* * * *

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that since the connected Writ Appeal was dismissed, nothing survives for adjudication. Therefore, this Criminal Revision may be dismissed as infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition are closed.

24.04.2017 mrp/ah To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Sub-Divisional Magistrate), Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur District.

2. The Joint Land Commissioner, (Under the Land Reforms Act), Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District 609 001.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court,

Chennai.

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.

mrp Crl. R.C.No.55 of 2014 24.04.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in