← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22096/2012disposed of

Dr.K.Krishnasamy, M.D., M.L.A. v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2025-10-10Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.10.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN DR.K.KRISHNASAMY : Petitioner Vs 1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LAW DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9.

2.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ADI DRAVIDAR AND TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9.

3.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9 4.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9 5.THE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR SCHEDULED CASTES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN LOK NAYAK BHAVAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI-110 003.

6.J.YASOTHA

7.ARUL OLI URAVIN MURAI NALA SANGAM (REGD. NO.S272/1987) REP. BY ITS SECRETARY T.ANANDARAJ 9-2ND STREET, 2ND LANE RAJAJI NAGAR VILLIVAKKAM CHENNAI-600 049.

8.K.DEELIPAN 9.K.PRABHAKARAN 10.DR.I.V.MANIVANNAN 11.P.SAMPATH 12.G.RAMAKRISHNAN : Respondents (Respondents 6 to 12 impleaded as per order dated 03.10.2012 in M.P.Nos.2 to 8 of 2012) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring the Tamil Nadu Arunthathiyars (Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions and of appointments or posts in the services under the State within the Reservation for the Scheduled Castes) Act 2009 (Tamil Nadu Act 4 of 2009) the rules made thereunder and the consequential G.O.(Ms).No.50 dated 29.4.2009 G.O.(Ms).No.61 dated 29.5.2009 G.O.(Ms).No.65 dated 27.5.2009 and all consequential proceedings as ultra vires of the Constitution of India being violative of Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 and 341 of the Constitution of India. For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Saravana Vel For Respondents :

Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader Assisted by Mr.K.karthik Jagannath, Government Advocate, for respondents 1 to 4 Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari, SPCCG, for R5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events, nothing survives for consideration in this petition and the petition may be disposed of.

2. Placing on record the said statement, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There will be no order as to costs.

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 10.10.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No tar To 1.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LAW DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9.

2.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ADI DRAVIDAR AND TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J.

(tar) 3.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9 4.THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9 5.THE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR SCHEDULED CASTES LOK NAYAK BHAVAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI-110 003.

10.10.2025