← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/2603/2013closed

P.R.Jayabalan v. K.Gnanadesikan Ias

2021-02-17Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR

1. P.R.Jayabalan, No.257/1, Vellalapuram, Oottupattrai, Coonoor 643 105.

2. D.Devaraj, No.114A LIC Colony, Rajaji Nagar, Coonoor 643 102.

3. R.Ganesh, No.11/29-9, Kenthala, Kattary Post, Pincode 643 213.

... Petitioners -vs1. K.Gnanadesikan, IAS The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Electricity Avenue, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

1/4

2. Er.A.Raja, The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Electricity Avenue, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

3. Er.T.Haldurai, The Superintending Engineer, Nilgiris Electricity Distribution Circle, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 to punish the respondents under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately and willfully disobeying the order of the Hon'ble Court dated 21.12.2010 in M.P. No. 4 of 2010 in W.P. No. 29303 of 2010.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Govardhanam For Respondents : Mr.Karthik Rajan TNEB 2/4

O R D E R

This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the interim order passed by this Court dated 21.12.2010 made in M.P. No. 4 of 2010 in W.P. No. 29303 of 2010.

2. After some hearings, when this Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing today, both the learned counsel appearing for the parties, were of opinion that, since the Contempt Petition arises out of an interim order passed and the main Writ Petition itself is of the year 2010, instead of pursuing this Contempt Petition, the main Writ Petition may be taken up for hearing and in one way or other, the Writ Petition may be disposed of. Accordingly, the parties would abide by the decision to be made in this regard.

3. In view of the said stand taken by the learned counsel appearing for both sides, this Court feels that, instead of keeping this Contempt Petition pending, which arises out of an interim order passed in the year 3/4

2010, the main Writ Petition itself can be taken up, so that, a quietus can be given for the issue raised in the Writ Petition.

4. In that view of the matter, this Contempt Petition is closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) vji //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/26/03/2021 4/4