A.Shankar, v. The Information Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.959 of 2010 A.Shankar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Kamadhenu Super Market Building, Chennai - 600 018.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Central Range, Vigilance and Anti-corruption, Chennai - 28.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in the order bearing Case No.17347/Enquiry/2009 dated 22.12.2009 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and direct the second respondent to furnish the information sought by the petitioner vide his application dated 04.04.2009. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Radhakrishnan For R1 : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopal for M/S.G.R.Associates For R2 : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, AGP

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Kamadhenu Super Market Building, Chennai - 600 018.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Central Range, Vigilance and Anti-corruption, Chennai - 28.

+1cc to Government Pleader sr.no.85122 +1cc to M/S.G.R.Associates, Advocate sr.no.84248 W.P.No.959 of 2010 ssd(co) nr 09/01/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/