Endeka Ceramics India Pvt.Ltd. v. State Industries Promotion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.08.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.9926 of 2010 ENDEKA CERAMICS INDIA PVT.LTD., Plot NO.74 & 75 SIPCOT Electronics Complex Phase II Kumudepalli POST HOSUR 635 109 Rep.by its Managing Director Ms.Asha Sampath ... Petitioner -VsState Industries Promotion, Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited 19-A Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Post Box NO.7223, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ or order or direction, particularly in the nature of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent pertaining to impugned letter bearing D-II/ SICH/JMCL/63/2010 dated 10.3.2010 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondent to grant approval for name change from Johnson Matthey Ceramics India Private Ltd. to Endeka Ceramics India Private Ltd which is the present name of the Petitioner Company without levy of any charge as indicated in the impugned letter. For Petitioner: M/s.S.T.K.Bhaskar For Respondent : M/s.Sudharshana Sunder
O R D E R
The present writ petition has been filed for writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records dated 10.03.2010 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to grant approval for name change from Johnson Matthey Ceramics India Private Ltd. to Endeka Ceramics India Private Ltd which is the present name of the Petitioner Company without levy of any charge as indicated in the impugned letter.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit without going into the merits of the matter that there was a confusion in the application and hence prays for liberty to file fresh application indicating the name of the Company which was mentioned in the Lease Deed along with necessary documents for change of company name in the Lease Deed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that if any application is filed, the same would be considered in the manner known to law within a stipulated time as prescribed by this Court.
4. Considering the above facts, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, I am inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to file fresh application along with necessary documents. Hence, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file fresh application indicating the name of the Company which was mentioned in the Lease Deed along with necessary documents for change of Company name in the lease deed. If such application is filed by the respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the respondent has to pass order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above observation. No costs.
sk Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To State Industries Promotion, Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited 19-A Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Post Box NO.7223, Egmore.
+1cc to Mr.T.K.Bhaskar, Advocate, SR.No.69705 +1cc to Mrs.Sudharshana Sundar, Advocate, SR.No.68988 W.P.No.9926 of 2010 Kak(18/09/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/