Madras High CourtCRL OP/3266/2023disposed of

Chandiran v. State Rep.By

2023-02-13Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

1. Chandiran

2. Arjunan ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State represented by, The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kaveripattinam Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

... Respondents PRAYER : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 3 not to harass the petitioners and their family members by way of threatening them to execute the bond for good behavior before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri, without pendency of the case against them.

1/4

For Petitioners : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate(Crl.side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and their family, by way of threatening them to execute the bond for good behavior before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there were some cases pending as against the petitioners and after full trial, they were acquitted in those cases. Now the respondent police threatening the petitioners to execute the bond for good behavior before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri. Therefore, the present petition has been filed.

3. In response, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioners are history sheeters in H.S.No.45 2/4

of 2014 and H.S.No.42 of 2014 respectively. He further submitted only in connection with the pending history sheets, the petitioners were called for enquiry as a routine check. If the petitioners have been acquitted in the criminal cases pending against them, they can move before the competent authority for removal of their names from the History Sheet.

4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court directs the petitioners to take appropriate steps for removal of their names from the history sheet. Therefore, no further orders is required in this case.

5. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

13.02.2023 ham Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order 3/4

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

ham To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kaveripattinam Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

13.02.2023 4/4