J. Nithyanandan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 10.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.39657 of 2005 and WP.MP.No.42513 of 2005 J.Nithyanandan

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet Division, O/o. The RDO, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, The Taluk Office, Tambaram, G.S.T. Road, Chrompet, Chennai.

3. M.Rajakoti ..Respondents Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order dated 22.04.2005 in Mu.Mu.5134/2005 Aa 2, passed by the second respondent and to quash the same as arbitrary unfounded in law, illegal, unlawful, without jurisdiction and against the principles of natural justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jeyakumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Anand, G.A., for RR1 & 2 Mr.N.Jayaraman, for R3

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been file for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order of the second respondent dated 22.04.2005.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

has been settled and the property in question has been alienated to a third party. It is further submitted that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet Division, O/o. The RDO, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, The Taluk Office, Tambaram, G.S.T. Road, Chrompet, Chennai.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.58572 W.P.No.39657 of 2005 SVI(CO) RRS(19/08/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/