Rathinam v. State Represented By

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

The petitioner/accused in Crime No.17 of 2024, registered by the respondent police for the offences under Sections 420, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant and the petitioner had entered into an agreement of sale with respect to properties at S.F.Nos.146/4 and 146/4B measuring 12 cents. The consideration had also been agreed. It is stated that the defacto complainant had given an advance but however, subsequently the petitioner is said to have not come forward to execute the sale deed. 3.Let me not express any further opinion on that particular aspect but limit myself to granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein subject to the following conditions:

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on

anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Edappady, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed

and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

14.02.2024 ata C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

ata

14.02.2024