S. Veerappan, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.07.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.39857 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.42736 of 2005 S.Veerappan ... Petitioner vs.

The Commissioner, Edappadi Panchayat Union, Edappadi, Salem District.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.2565/05/A6 dated 13.07.2005 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service, with all attendant benefits.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondent :

Mr.K.Magesh Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, nothing further survives for consideration in this matter.

2. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, as nothing further survives for consideration, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected W.P.M.P.No.42736 of 2005 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (aeb/jas)

To:

The Commissioner, Edappadi Panchayat Union, Edappadi, Salem District.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.24893 W.P.No.39857 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.42736 of 2005 LN(CO) GMY(03/08/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/