Madras High CourtCRP/6/2011dismissed as infructuous

R.Srinivasan v. D.Gokulanathan

2019-04-11Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.6 and 7 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5 and 5 of 2011 R.Srinivasan

...Petitioner

(in both CRP(NPD)s) Vs.

D.Gokulanathan

...Respondent

(in both CRP(NPD)s) COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to revise, strike down and set aside the impugned Docket Orders of the Court of Execution made on 23.12.2010 in the petitioner's Memo S.R.Nos.64948 & 64949 of 2010 in E.P.No.261 of 2008 and for consequential reliefs (E.P pending on the file of the learned 9th Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.) For Petitioner : No appearance (in both CRP(NPD)s) For Respondents : Mr.T.V.Krishnakumar (in both CRP(NPD)s) http://www.judis.nic.in

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

ms C O M M O N O R D E R Today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the revision petitioner. Despite his name printed in the cause list, there is no appearance either in person or through counsel. Hence, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 11.04.2019 Internet : Yes / No ms To 1.The 9th Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.6 and 7 of 2011 http://www.judis.nic.in