A. Abiramai Gayathri v. Jeyagopal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. No. 229 of 2018

1. S.Abirami Gayathri

2. C.S.Sundaramurthi ...Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs.

1. Jeyagopal

2. Nandagopal

3. Indirani

...Respondents/ Defendant

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2016 passed by the IV Additional Judge at City Civil Court at Chennai in A.S.No.354 of 2014 reversing the partial decree and judgment dated 31.07.2014 passed by the VIII Assistant City Civil Judge at Chennai in O.S.No.6496 of 2013.

For Appellant :

No appearance

JUDGMENT

In this matter, counsel for the appellants had already reported no instructions and made an endorsement to that effect. The appellants on being called and remaining absent, the registry was directed to list the matter on 19.08.2019 under the caption "for dismissal" by printing the name of the appellants in the cause list.

2. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called, absent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In the light of the above position, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bga 1.THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT , CHENNAI 2.THE VIII ASSISTANT, CITY CIVIL JUDGE,CHENNAI S.A. No. 229 of 2018 A.SK(09/10/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/