Madras High CourtCRP/814/2011dismissed as infructuous

Saroja Deceased v. M.Jayachandran

2020-07-22Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.07.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRP.Nos. 814 & 815 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2011 Saroja (deceased)

1. Ravi

2. Sekar

3. Malarvizhi

4. Manvizhi

5. Kumar

6. Sankar 7.Sundar 8.Navamani 9.Ezhilvizhi ..Petitioner in both CRPs.

1. Jayachandran

2. Pappammal

3. Amsam

4. Shantha (deceased)

5. Vimala ..Respondents in both CRPs Prayer : Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order made in E.A.Nos.110 & 111 of 2008 in O.S.No. 93/1983 in E.P.No.73 of 2001 dated 05.08.2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sirkali.

For Petitioners : M/s.Sumitra (in both CRPs) For Respondents : Mr.M.Venkatesan - R1 (in both CRPs) COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order made in E.A.Nos.110 & 111 of 2008 in O.S.No. 93/1983 in E.P.No.73 of 2001 dated 05.08.2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sirkali.

2. It is seen from records that despite sufficient opportunities given, the petitioners have not taken steps to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bring the legal heirs of deceased respondent on record. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has also submitted that she has not received any instructions from the petitioners to proceed with the case.

3. In view of the these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak To The District Munsif, Sirkali +2cc to M/s.Sumitra, Advocate SR.No.25062 CRP.Nos. 814 & 815 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2011 ks(CO) GMY(20/08/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/