Madras High CourtWP/15718/2016dismissed as infructuous

M.Kanniappan v. The Commissioner

2022-11-11Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11-11-2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Mr.M.Kanniappan ..

Petitioner vs.

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, General Department, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent relating to the passing of the impugned order issued in proceeding No.Po.Thu.Na.Ka.No.E5/45009/2015 dated 20.11.2015 1/4

and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to promote the petitioner with full salary and all attended benefits from 01.03.2011. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.G.T.Subramanian, Standing Counsel for Greater Chennai Corporation.

O R D E R

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation made a submission that the cause did not exist and the case became infructuous. The petitioner also died. More-so, none appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 11-11-2022 Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order.

Svn To 2/4

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, General Department, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

3/4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn WP 15718 of 2016 11-11-2022 4/4