A.Kalasha, v. The Regional Transport Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.4689 of 2014 A.Kalasha ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078.

2.M.Ahameed ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2013 and to take necessary action according to law on the petitioner representation against the 2nd respondent (M.Ahameed, Resident of No.7/8, Mohamed Mansion at Karaigudi). For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar Special Government Pleader (For R1)

ORDER

Heard Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for direction upon the first respondent to take action against the second respondent.

3.Record of the proceedings shows that the writ petition as against the second respondent was dismissed on 17.08.2015 and till date, no steps have been taken to restore the same. Without the presence of the second respondent, the relief sought https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for by the petitioner cannot be adjudicated. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as against the first respondent also. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to restore the writ petition against both the respondents. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (J) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar cse To The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078.

1 cc to Government Pleader, Wr. 62478 W.P.No.4689 of 2014 GJ(CO) kk 23/11 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/