Madras High CourtCRP/679/2021dismissed as withdrawal

Balakrishnan @ Vijayavarma v. Arul Ganesan

2021-03-26Honourable Mrs Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan2 pages

C.R.P.(PD) No.679 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.03.2021 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN C.R.P.(NPD) No.679 of 2021 Balakrishnan @ Vijayavarma ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Arul Ganesan,

2. Kumar ... Respondents Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. praying for to set aside the fair order and decreetal order dated 10.12.2020 passed in I.A. No.352 of 2020 in O.S. No.8 of 2011 on the file of the Sub-Ordinate Judge, Chidambaram.

For Petitioner ... Mr.R. Gururaj For Respondents ... No Appearance ****

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. praying for to set aside the fair order and decreetal order dated 10.12.2020 passed in I.A. No.352 of 2020 in O.S. No.8 of 2011 on the file of the Sub-Ordinate Judge, Chidambaram.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 1/2

C.R.P.(PD) No.679 of 2021 V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

, lbm

2. When this matter came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as the petitioner has already filed A.S. No.20 of 2021 before the Appellate Court challenging the ex-parte order in O.S. No.8 of 2011, this Civil Revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to raise all these issues in the First appeal.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all these issues before the first appellate court. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs.

26.03.2021 Lbm Index: Yes/No.

Speaking/Non-Speaking order Internet: Yes/No.

To:Sub-Ordinate Judge, Chidambaram.

C.R.P.(NPD) No.679 of 2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/2