← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4156/2026dismissed

Ruthrappa @ Renu v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

2026-03-06Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ruthrappa @ Renu S/o Vadivel, NO.46, Ooni Street, Udhayendram, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Tirupattur District.

..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by:

The Inspector Of Police Tirupathur Taluk Police Station, Tirupathur District.

Crime No.55 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with the case in S.C.No.57 of 2025 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Court, Tirupathur For Petitioner(s):

Mr. J.Pradeep For Respondent(s):

Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side).

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 332(b), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1) of B.N.S. altered to Sections 103(1), 109(1), 118(2), 296(b), 332(a) and

3(5) of B.N.S. in Crime No.55 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.02.2025, the petitioner along with other accused trespassed into the defacto complainant's sister's house and assaulted the defacto complainant's sister and her husband using iron rod, thereby she sustained severe head injury and died on spot.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) strongly objected to enlarge the petitioner on bail by stating that there are 4 other previous cases and out of which, one case is a murder case.

4. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, it appears that there are 4 previous cases pending against this petitioner and among which, one case is a murder case. The mere submission of the learned Government Advocate would indicate that every time, the petitioner is misusing the liberty granted by this Court. Therefore, when such person is enlarged on bail, notwithstanding completion of trial, there would be more possibility to involve in the similar nature of offences and therefore, considering the above circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this time.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06-03-2026 MJS Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

2. The Inspector Of Police, Tirupathur Taluk Police Station, Tirupathur District.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

MJS 06-03-2026