Velusamy v. The State Rep.By

Crl.O.P.No.11627 of 2016 S.VAIDHYANATHAN, J., The petitioner who was arrayed as accused was arrested on 09.05.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) of IPC altered into 366(A) of IPC & Section 5(i) r/w 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in Cr.No.263 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had kidnapped the daughter of the defacto complainant aged about 17 years and had physical relationship with her.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate [Crl.Side] submitted that on the basis of the statement given by the victim girl, the petitioner had been arrested.

5. From the perusal of the statement of the victim girl, it is clear that the petitioner had kidnapped and had sexual intercourse forcibly. In view of the specific overt act alleged against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 06.06.2016 smi