← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/3222/2021granted

Kumaresan v. State Rep.By

2021-04-29Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3222 of 2021 KUMARESAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-II, LAND GRABBING WING-II, CHENNAI.

CRIME NO. 134 OF 2018.

For Petitioner : M/S.P.BASKARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S. M.PRABHAVATHI, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who was arrested on 12.01.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Sections 419, 465, 467, 468, 474 read with 34 of IPC in Cr.No.134 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is arrayed as A4 in this case. The allegation is that the property belongs to the defacto complainant. A1 impersonated himself as original owner, executed a settlement deed in favour of his wife A2 and thereafter, A2 has given a power of attorney to A3, who is driver of the petitioner and when the same was questioned by the defacto complainant, he has given evasive reply. Based on the complainant given by the defacto complainant, the crime has been registered against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this Court after elaborate consideration granted interim bail to the petitioner on 02.03.2021. He would further submit that the petitioner after grant of interim bail did not violate any of the conditions and he is also regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate also did not dispute the facts submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 5.In view of the above, the interim bail granted to the petitioner by this Court on 02.03.2021 is made absolute and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

-sd/- 29/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TAMBARAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-II, LAND GRABBING WING-II, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB-JAIL, CHENGALPET.

6 THE SUB REGISTRAR, PAMMAL.

+1 CC to M/S.P.BASKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 5319 CRL OP.3222/2021 Date :29/04/2021 MN-17/05/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/