Jankiraman v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3064 of 2021 JANAKIRAMAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CYBER CRIME CELL, CHENNAI (CR.NO.9/2019) For Petitioner : M/S.K.G.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATHAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.9 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 420, 468 IPC r/w Sections 66C and 66D of Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 and Sections 20 and 21 of Telegraph Act, 1885 in Cr.NO.9 of 2019. 2.

The learned Government Advocate submitted that after investigation, the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in this case and his name has not found in the FIR and hence there is no apprehension of arrest at the hands of the respondent Police. 3.The above submission made by the learned Government Advocate is recorded and accordingly, this petition is closed. -sd/- 16/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CYBER CRIME CELL, CHENNAI 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.G.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.3064/2021 Date :16/06/2021 RVR 29/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/