← Library
Madras High CourtWP/952/2018disposed of

Sridhar Babu, v. The District Revenue Officer

2018-01-17Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.01.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.952 of 2018 Sridhar Babu S/o.A.E.Ramachandran .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri.

2.The Sub-Collector Hosur.

3.The Tahsildar Taluk office Dhenkanikottai Krishnagiri District.

4.Saraswathamma W/o.Chinnasamy 5.Ravichandran S/o.Ramaiah ... Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to consider and pass orders in the representation dated 06.11.2017 in accordance with law and within a stipulated period.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.D.Suriya Narayanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3

O R D E R

Mr.D.Suriya Narayanan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Since this writ petition is being disposed of, without passing any positive order affecting the interest of the respondents 4 & 5, notice to those respondents is dispensed with.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The petitioner seeks for mandamus directing the first respondent to consider his representation dated 06.11.2017, wherein and whereby, he sought for cancellation of UDR Patta given in the name of the fourth respondent, which was subsequently, transferred in the name of the fifth respondent.

3. According to the petitioner, the said UDR Patta which originally stood in his name, was wrongly transferred in the name of the fourth respondent, without issuing notice and giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner approached the first respondent and has given the above said representation seeking for cancellation of UDR Patta.

4. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the first respondent to consider and decide the same. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the first respondent to consider the said representation of the petitioner and pass orders on the same, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respondents 4 &

5. Such exercise shall be done by the first respondent, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mk To 1.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri.

2.The Sub-Collector Hosur.

3.The Tahsildar Taluk office Dhenkanikottai Krishnagiri District.

+ 1 cc to Mr.K.Govi Ganesan Advocate,SR.3597 + 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, SR.4120 W.P.No.952 of 2018 nr 07/02/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/