Alinazar v. P.Mangali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA Alinazar ... Petitioner vs.

1.P.Mangali 2.P.Radhakrishnan 3.P.Subramani 4.P.Adhilakshmi Krishnan 5.Pottiammal 6.G.Pakkirisami 7.G.Arumugham 8.Mariyammal 9.Muniyammal 10.Pakkiri 11.Krishnan 12.Radhakrishnan 13.Ramachandran 14.R.Balakrishnan 15.R.Alwarchetty 16.R.Thangammal 17.R.Jayakantha 18.Sivapakkiam 19.Dasarathan 20.Maheswari 21.Mani 22.Mallika 23.Illamalli 24.Susheela 25.Thulukanam 26.Varadammal 1/5

27.Dhanasingh 28.Peter(Deceased) 29.Stephen 30.Kalista 31.Rajamani 32.Lucy Mary 33.Elizabeth Mary 34.Fathima Mary 35.Vincent 36.Glory 37.Marimuthammal 38.Rajendran 39.Rajakili 40.Chinnaponnu 41.Pottukili 42.Bagavathar (Deceased) 43.Rajeswari 44.Menaka 45.Ponammal 46.Desamuthu 47.Devaraj 48.Thulukanam (Deceased) 49.Nagammal 50.Annadurai 51.Anthoni 52.Easwari 53.Umeshwari 54.Padma 55.Raja 56.Madhi 57.Anbazhagi 58.Amul 59.Sekar Annalakshmi 60.Ruthnesamani (Respondents 13 to 60 remained exparte before the lower Court hence they are not necessary party in the civil revision petition) 61.Rengasamy 2/5

62.Adhimoolam 63.Mrs.Rashida ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Sub Judge, Tambaram to dispose of the Suit in O.S.No.135 of 2011 within a stipulated period as may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

O R D E R

When the Civil Revision Petition came up for hearing on 05.08.2019, there was no representation for the revision petitioner and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 06.08.2019. Even today, i.e., 06.08.2019 there is no representation for the revision petitioner.

2. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

06.08.2019 rrg Index : Yes/No 3/5

To The Sub Judge, Tambaram.

4/5

R.HEMALATHA, J.

rrg 06.08.2019 5/5