Madhan v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.02.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Madhan S/o. Raju ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by:

The Inspector of Police, D1 Triplicane Police Station, Triplicane, Chennai-600 002.

(Crime No.32 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.32 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr. P. Santhosh For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.01.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.32 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 125, 311 and 351(3) of BNS.

1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant, abused him with filthy language, at knife point, robbed Rs.500/-, assaulted him using hands and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 22.01.2025; and that further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, submitted that, totally there are 2 accused; that the petitioner is also involved in one another previous case and investigation is pending.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

2/5

6. Considering the nature of allegations, period of incarceration and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the 3/5

learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

07.02.2025 mjs To

1. The II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, D1 Triplicane Police Station, Triplicane, Chennai-600 002.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

mjs 07.02.2025 5/5