Madras High CourtCRL A/229/2013withdrawn dismissed

Jenitha Jasmine v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-01-22Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.01.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.A.No.229 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 JENITHA JASMINE D/o.S.Anthony Doss ... Appellant/Defacto complainant (victim) Vs.

1.STATE BY:

INPECTOR OF POLICE All Women Police Station Cuddalore (In Crime No.11 of 2010) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.S.STEPHEN RAJ 3.SOWRIMUTHU 4.GNANASOUNDARI 5.JOSEPH 6.SELVI 7.LURDUSWAMY ... Respondents 2 to 7/ Accused 1 to 6 PRAYER:Criminal Appeal filed filed under Section 372 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment dated 31.05.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore in S.C.No.215 of 2011 and convict the respondents/ accused 2 to 7 in accordance with law.

MP.1/2013 Petition praying to record the further evidence of the petitioner (PW1) and the Doctor (PW5) before this Honourable Court in the above appeal Crl.A.No.229/2013.

For Appellant : Mrs.Jenitha Jasmine Party in Person For Respondents : Mrs.Sharadha Devi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.Sivakumar for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates for R2 to R7

J U D G M E N T

This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the Appellant / victim, against the Judgment of acquittal of the respondents 2 to 7 for the offences under Section 498(A), 506(II), 420, 313 and 307 of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Since there was no representation for the Appellant on the earlier hearings, this Court had directed the 1st respondent, the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Cuddalore to intimate the Appellant about the pendncy of the case. 2.Today, the Appellant viz. Jenitha Jasmine, D/o.S.Anthony Doss, is present through video conference, and she was identified by the Sub Inspector of Police viz.Sudarmathi, attached to the 1st respondent Police Station, All Women Police Station, Cuddalore.

The Appellant would submit that she is not interested in prosecuting the Appeal and she would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Appeal. 3.In view of the submission made by the Appellant, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To 1.

2.The Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104 4.The Section Officer Criminal Section High Court, Madras.

PVS(CO) SM/24/02/2021 Crl.A.No.229 of 2013