Syndicate Bank Obc Employees Sangham, v. The Union Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P.Nos.5949, 5952 & 5954 of 2020 Syndicate Bank OBC Employees Sangham F2 S V Flats, D13 2nd Cross in 3rd Street, E B Colony, Adambakkam, Chennai - 600 088 Represented by its General Secretary, Mr.R.P.Ilango Yadav

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliamentary Street, New Delhi - 110 001.

3.Central Vigilance Commission, Satkarta Bhavan, A Block, G P O complex, INA Colony, New Delhi - 110 023.

1/4

4.Syndicate Bank represented by The Managing Director & CEO, Syndicate Bank Corporate Office, 2nd Cross, Gandhi Nagar, Banglore - 560 009, Karnataka.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in circular No.618-2019-BC-HRD-123-HRMD dated 06.12.2019, and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 4th respondent to issue a fresh notification with referral to the promotion process with vacancies and pass such further orders.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For R1 :

Mr.K.Subbu Ranga Bharathi, Central Government Counsel For R3 :

No appearance For R4 :

M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.11.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'For Orders' on 12.11.2024. Again, on 12.11.2024, 2/4

there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "For Dismissal" on 14.11.2024.

2. Even today, 14.11.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing at 11.30 a.m., none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It is made clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.

3. Since there is no representation for the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed for NonProsecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

14.11.2024 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order 3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

cda To 1.The Secretary, The Union of India, Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Secretary, The Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliamentary Street, New Delhi - 110 001.

3.Central Vigilance Commission, Satkarta Bhavan, A Block, G P O complex, INA Colony, New Delhi - 110 023.

14.11.2024 4/4