Kamaz Vectra Motors Ltd v. G.Jothivel,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 28.08.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN C.R.P.(PD)No.1782 of 2012 Kamaz Vectra Motors Ltd., Rep.by its Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Alexey Bagi Balov.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.G.Jothivel 2.P.Anumuthu 3.Y.Augestin 4.D.Munimada 5.K.Senthilkumar 6.A.Senthilkumar 7.S.V.Sanjayakumar 8.R.Manjunath 9.D.J.Prashanth 10.T.Edison 11.P.Muralikumar 12.S.Kuppan 13.R.Balamurugan 14.S.Mahendiran 15.M.Venkatesan 16.K.Ravidran 17.Appiah Gowda 18.G.Surulinathan 1/6

19.J.Murthy 20.Venkata Rao 21.K.T.Shajahan 22.B.Krishnakumar 23.K.Jayaraman 24.T.Balachandar 25.K.S.Shabbar 26.Joy Vargheze 27.M.Gopi 28.V.Jayaprkash 29.C.Siva 30.M.Prakash 31.T.Senthilkumar 32.P.Sampathu 33.K.Chandrasekaran 34.G.Anil Kumar 35.Sundaresh 36.S.Murali 37.A.Saravan Kumar 38.D.Ashok Kumar 39.A.Vijayaraghavan 40.R.Jegan 41.M.Duraiselvan 42.A.R.Sabapathy 43.N.Muralimuthu 44.P.Lakshmanan 45.K.Murugupandian 46.C.Sankar 47.A.Viswanathan 48.K.Yogesh 49.G.Thangapandi 50.S.Karthik 51.N.Magesh 52.V.Munivel 53.C.Anand Christopher Dhas 2/6

54.K.T.Murugavel 55.R.Kumar 56.T.Vincent Periya Nayagam 57.Easwara Kharvi 58.Harish Kumar 59.S.Antony Prince Madan 60.Biplab Bera 61.Surya Kant Pandey 62.Shashi Kapur 63.P.K.Sivakumar 64.Rajan Kumar Shee 65.Surajith Sandha 66.Ramachandra Samal 67.Manas Ranjan Behera 68.Lokanah Sahoo 69.Rakesh Kumar Nayak 70.Deepak Pandey 71.Babaso D Patil 72.Patil Pahul Santaji 73.Raquib Alam ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records in respect of I.A.No.139 of 2012 in O.S.No.22 of 2012 pending on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Hosur, dated 11.04.2012 and set aside the same. For Petitioner : T.Ramesh for Mr.K.R.Harikaran For Respondents : No appearance 3/6

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to call for the records in respect of I.A.No.139 of 2012 in O.S.No.22 of 2012 pending on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Hosur, dated 11.04.2012 and set aside the same.

2. Even, when the matter was called in the previous occasion, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 14.08.2020. Even today, when the matter is called, counsel for the petitioner is not ready to argue the matter. But the representing counsel seeks adjourment. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. 28.08.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No 4/6

dna 5/6

To The Subordinate Court, Hosur.

6/6

P.VELMURUGAN, J., dna C.R.P.(PD)No.1782 of 2012 28.08.2020 7/6

8/6