Prabhu v. Perumal Naidu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA C.R.P.(PD).No.1809 of 2012 and C.R.P.M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Prabhu 2.Udayakumar @ Kumar, 3.Ramesh ...Revision petitioners vs.

Perumal Naidu

...Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.23 of 2011 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2000, dated 10.08.2011 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Villupuram (Rent Controller, Villupuram). For Petitioners : Mr.M.Gnana morrthy for M/s.N.Suresh For Respondent : No appearance

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners contended that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous since RCOP itself has been disposed of on merits. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

http://www.judis.nic.in

R.HEMALATHA, J.

dua

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

11.06.2019 dua Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To The Principal District Munsif, Villupuram (Rent Controller, Villupuram).

C.R.P.(PD).No.1809 of 2012 and C.R.P.M.P.No.1 of 2012 http://www.judis.nic.in