← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30761/2014dismissed

S.Senthil Kumar, v. Director Of Employment

2016-09-22Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE : 22-09-2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.30761 of 2014 S.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner Vs 1.Director of Employment & Training Head Office Alandur Road, Guindy Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-32.

2.Joint Director (Craftsman Training) Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

... Respondents Prayer : The writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue Appointment Order to the petitioner based on interview, dated 21.7.2014 for the post of Junior Training Officer based on Call Letter Rc.No.TP 2/53020/2013, dated 15.7.2014.

For Petitioner : M/s.P.R.Balasubramanian For Respondents Nos.1 & 2 : Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Heard.

2. This writ petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue an Appointment Order, to the petitioner, based on the interview conducted on 21.7.2014, for the post of, 'Junior Training Officer'.

3. The petitioner has stated that he had applied for the post of 'Junior Training Officer'. Based on the call letter

issued for the selection of the candidates for the said post, the petitioner had attended the interview on 21.7.2014. However, the petitioner had not been issued with an appointment order, even though he is fully qualified for the said post.

4. In such circumstances, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition, before this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

5. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it has been stated that the petitioner had taken part in the interview, before the Selection Committee, on 21.7.2014, under Backward Caste General Non priority quota, for Wireman trade and his performance in the practical skill/teaching ability, as well as in the interview was not upto the mark and therefore, he has not been selected.

6. It has been further stated that though the petitioner had attended the interview along with nine other candidates, nobody was selected by the Selection Committee. In such circumstances, the petitioner cannot claim that he should have been selected and appointed as 'Junior Training Officer', as prayed for by him, in the present writ petition.

7. It is also made clear, in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents that, even though the petitioner had been sponsored by the Employment Exchange, the Selection Committee, constituted for the purpose of selecting the candidates,for the post of 'Junior Training Officer', had not selected the petitioner, as he did not possess the necessary practical skill/teaching ability,as required for the said post.

8. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the parties concerned and on a perusal of the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, this Court does not find any cause or reason, to grant the relief, as prayed for by the petitioner. In such circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the claim made by the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

rnb To 1.The Director of Employment & Training Head Office Alandur Road, Guindy Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-32.

2.The Joint Director (Craftsman Training) Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

+1cc to Mr.P.R.Balasubramanian, Advocate, S.R.No.53941 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.54470 Writ Petition No.30761 of 2014 KK(CO) CA(14/11/2016)