← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4441/2024disposed of

M.Dominic Savio v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2024-02-23Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.02.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY M.Dominic Savio ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue and Disaster Management Department Fort St. George, Chennai - 09.

2. The Commissioner of Land Administration Land Administration, Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3. The Collector Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

4. The Tahsildar Pallavaram Taluk, Pallavaram, Chennai.

5. The Revenue Inspector Pallavaram Sub Division Pallavaram Division, Chennai.

6. The Executive Officer Cantonment Board St. Thomas Mount, Pallavaram, Chennai.

7. The Special Officer cum Assistant Commissioner Arulmigu Kasiviswanathan Thirukovil St. Thomas Mount, Chennai - 600 039.

..

Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioners revision petition dated 2.02.2024 filed in Na.Ka.No.10881/2023/A3 dated 25.10.2023 in light of the order passed by the Division Bench in W.P.No.24693 of 2023 dated 7.11.2023 within a time limit.

For the Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For the Respondents : Mr.C.Kathiravan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R5 Mr.NRR.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader (HR & CE) for R7

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.C.Kathiravan, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 5 and Mr.NRR.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader (HR & CE) for respondent 7.

2. It is hardly twenty days since the petitioner has filed the revision petition. Now, the present writ petition has been filed seeking directions against the first respondent to consider the revision petition filed by the petitioner. We cannot encourage such petitions.

3. The authority certainly has to decide the revision, on its own merits and in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months.

4. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.4819 of 2024 is closed (S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 23.02.2024 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No drm

To

1. The Principal Secretary to Government The State of Tamil Nadu Revenue and Disaster Management Department Fort St. George, Chennai - 09.

2. The Commissioner of Land Administration Land Administration, Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3. The Collector Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

4. The Tahsildar Pallavaram Taluk, Pallavaram, Chennai.

5. The Revenue Inspector Pallavaram Sub Division Pallavaram Division, Chennai.

6. The Executive Officer Cantonment Board St. Thomas Mount, Pallavaram, Chennai.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

(drm) 23.02.2024