Madras High CourtCS/527/2011dismissed for default

R.Venkatesan v. S.Maria Pushpam & 2 Others

2021-01-05Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.01.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM R.Venkatesan ... Plaintiff Vs.

1. S.Maria Pushpam

2. M/s Jai Instruments and Co., a partnership firm represented by its partner V.Jaishanker

3. Dr.S.John Britto Selvaraj ... Defendants Prayer: Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 OS Rules R/w Order VII Rule 1 CPC, praying to grant decree and judgment against the defendants herein (a) declaring the sale deed dated 04.05.2007 registered as D.No.2139 of 2007, before the office of the SRO, Velacherry, as null and void and not binding on the plaintiff; (b) for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants and/ or anybody claiming through or under them from encumbering and/or alienating and/or transferring and/or dealing with the immovable property, situated at Plot No.15, Door No.60, Lake Bund Road, 1/4

Lakshmi Hayagriva Nagar, Adambakkam, Chennai-600 088 and comprised in Old S.Nos.561, 562, 563, 564/1 and 564/2, New S.No.563/2B, Velacherry Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai District, within the sub-registration district of Velacherry and in the registration district of Chennai South, more fully and particularly described in Schedule hereunder, in any manner whatsoever and (C ) for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants and/or anybody claiming through or under them from interfering with the ownership, peaceful possession, occupation and enjoyment of the plaintiff in and over the immovable property, situated at Plot.No.15, Door No.60, Lake Bund Road, Lakshmi Hayagriva Nagar, Adambakkam, Chennai600 088 and comprised in Old.S.Nos.561, 562, 563, 564/1 and 564/2, New S.No.563/2B, Velacherry Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai District within the sub registration district of Velacherry and in the registration district of Chennai South, more fully and particularly described in Schedule and (d) for the cost of the suit.

For Plaintiff : No appearance For Defendants : Ms.Rukmani for Mr.P.B.Ramanujam for D1 : D2 and D3 -set exparte.

JUDGMENT

Since no representation for the plaintiff for several hearings, this matter has been posted today (05.01.2021) under the caption, " for dismissal". 2/4

2. Today also, no representation for the plaintiff. The learned counsel for the first defendant appeared through video conferencing. Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

05.01.2021 3/4

P. RAJAMANICKAM,J.

Vv 05.01.2021 4/4